Post by account_disabled on Jan 13, 2024 10:25:23 GMT 3
Which IoT products require precertification by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as health care products? Can drone operating rules be less stringent than those required by the Federal Aviation Administration for full-size aircraft? Do blockchain and cryptocurrencies constitute financial instruments subject to federal and state banking regulations? Should the government extend the ban on Chinese-made communications equipment and smartphone apps, among others? Can the content moderation practices of any website that contains user postings be subject to oversight by the FCC? Will certain new applications of facial recognition, quantum computing and artificial intelligence require pre-approval from government agencies to ensure they do not intentionally or unintentionally discriminate? Will Congress follow its European.
Counterparts and pass legislation governing the collection, ownership, security and use of consumer data? The answers to any of these questions could change the pace and trajectory of technological innovation. The problem is not just domestic. High-tech products and services have taken center stage in international trade disputes with major partners and competitors, notably the European Union, China Email Lists Database and South Korea. As the information economy increasingly becomes the economy, some industrialized countries have turned to familiar but outdated tools to improve their competitive position vis-à-vis the United States, including tariffs, billions of dollars in fines and other local protectionist policies. Get the latest in transformational leadership, evidence-based resources to help you lead your team more effectively, delivered to your inbox every month.
Will the new government deal with this tricky situation? Given the breadth of technological disruption and disruption, is it possible to develop a coherent approach, let alone one that carefully balances costs and benefits (many of which are unknown or uncalculated)? The short answer is yes. In fact, the United States has had such a strategy for many years. The general rule, at least for information technology, is to allow new industries and competitors to emerge and flourish unencumbered.
Counterparts and pass legislation governing the collection, ownership, security and use of consumer data? The answers to any of these questions could change the pace and trajectory of technological innovation. The problem is not just domestic. High-tech products and services have taken center stage in international trade disputes with major partners and competitors, notably the European Union, China Email Lists Database and South Korea. As the information economy increasingly becomes the economy, some industrialized countries have turned to familiar but outdated tools to improve their competitive position vis-à-vis the United States, including tariffs, billions of dollars in fines and other local protectionist policies. Get the latest in transformational leadership, evidence-based resources to help you lead your team more effectively, delivered to your inbox every month.
Will the new government deal with this tricky situation? Given the breadth of technological disruption and disruption, is it possible to develop a coherent approach, let alone one that carefully balances costs and benefits (many of which are unknown or uncalculated)? The short answer is yes. In fact, the United States has had such a strategy for many years. The general rule, at least for information technology, is to allow new industries and competitors to emerge and flourish unencumbered.